Posts Tagged FEATBC

Bev & Allison’s Story Part 2

Civil Rights Now! has gathered stories of the real lives of BC voters and children with disabilities and their families. Today we will start posting the stories. They are evidence that BC is not the Best Place on Earth for Canadian citizens with disabilities and their families. If you want to share your story with the readers of Civil Rights Now’s website please contact us civilrightsnow@yahoo.ca

Our first story is that of Civil Rights Now! Board member Beverly Sharpe and her daughter Allison.

PART TWO

Bev was frustrated by the lack of assistance by the pathologist and therapist but she knew she had to focus on what could be done for Allison starting at that point. She went to meet Jean Lewis. Bev arrived at Jean’s door with pen and paper and she thrilled to hear about a treatment for Autism. Bev was “buoyed because within the tremendous hole of black sorrow there was actually a ray of light because somebody was using the term treatment.” For the next three months Bev researched Lovaas ABA treatment, “I read copious amounts of information on the internet.” Bev also spoke with Dr. Sabrina Freeman, a contact through Jean Lewis, who was experienced in Autism and the Lovaas treatment.

While Bev was spending all her time researching this treatment for Allison she noticed that her husband wasn’t reading any of the information. “He seemed to disengage.” Bev continued on, reading about Autism and recognizing Allison in the behaviour encapsulated in the diagnosis of Autism. “I realized oh my goodness the eye squinting, the peculiar behaviour, the really looking at the lines in her hands, the running her fingers through my bowls of beans, it all made sense”. Bev was finding comfort in better understanding her daughter’s diagnosis. “I remember it all started to fit so that was at two years and nine months I had the diagnosis.”

Bev was determined to give Allison whatever treatment was available but she remembered the words that Jean Lewis had told her during their first meeting “there is treatment, it works, it’s not paid for”. Bev found the lack of coverage for Autism treatment confusing, “that was a little hard for me to understand being that we were both Canadian citizens, I had worked full time for many years at that time, paid into a government health system and her treatment’s not covered.” As Bev continued to look into Lovaas she “also learned that the best chance for the best outcome is to start the treatment early enough and intensively so I was determined to do this whether or not it was paid by the government.” Bev had an RSVP, some home equity, and she was bound and determined to give everything to Allison if needed. Her husband did “not share that enthusiasm, he had essentially disengaged, he had said let the child be and I said what are you talking about?” Bev had helped her husband through a illness of his own and she couldn’t believe that he didn’t want to help their daughter with a treatment that was proven to work. “She had no other hope than her parents” and yet her husband did not want to get involved.

Three months after first finding out about Lovaas Bev had hired ten potential ABA therapists, she had flown in a ABA behaviour consultant and had started a treatment program for Allison. After forty hours of treatment Allison imitated her first word which was mama and suddenly Bev “didn’t have to be sold” anymore on Lovaas because she saw how it helped her daughter. The power of hearing Allison say mama made Bev a believer but she also knew ABA was working because of the data. “The ABA treatment uses a lot of data and if the data shows that an intervention is not working you can increase it or you can change it”. Bev says that “it made sense, it was very logical but when I heard that word it was that reenforcementfor me I‘m not stopping.”

Unfortunately Allison’s father did not share Bev’s enthusiasm and he left ten days after treatment started. Bev remembers “I was left quite high and dry, I had two little children, and I had to work full time.”

Bev quickly learned that not only was the Autism treatment not covered by the government but that it was expensive. The first year of treatment was almost $35,000 and Bev earned $36,000 a year. “I decided I was going to give Allison the best chance that she had”. Bev thought “I’m on my own, this child needs treatment, what in God’s name am I going to do?” At first Bev thought of selling her North Shore home but the doctors and therapists all advised against it. They felt that Allison already had one shock, her father leaving, and removing Allison from her peer group and home would set Allison back. They also advised that Jackson would be affected by such a big change. Bev explains that the doctors told her that “a five year old mind can more easily digest having one factor like ‘oh my dad is out of my house now’ as opposed to several changed factors like my house, my room, my friend, my school, my teachers, my world”. Bev argued with the doctors asking how she was supposed to pay for the house, support her children, and pay for Allison’s treatment. “You are asking me to do the impossible I am a meat inspector I make $36,000 a year”. The health care specialist reiterated their view and Bev recalls her reaction of “you can’t breath, your gut aches, you know what is right and you just feel like you can’t do it.”

Bev realized that she had one big asset which was the house so she bought her husband out and decided to rent every room. Bev slept on the living room floor so that she could rent out her room to ensure that she found the money to care for both of her children in their home. Bev thought to herself “I will sleep on my living room floor and this little girl will get the treatment that she needs. I rented every room out, I bought Gyprock and I converted the garage into a living space and an office into a living space and I mean you name it I did it and by God I wasn’t sinking, I was treading water.” In addition to renting out rooms Bev worked overtime and got a second job. Bev took the early morning shifts so that she could be home in the afternoons with her children. She also wanted to make sure that she could oversee Allison’s treatment.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Bev & Allison’s Story Part 1

Civil Rights Now! has gathered stories of the real lives of BC voters and children with disabilities and their families. Today we will start posting the stories. They are evidence that BC is not the Best Place on Earth for Canadian citizens with disabilities and their families. If you want to share your story with the readers of Civil Rights Now’s website please contact us civilrightsnow@yahoo.ca

Our first story is that of Civil Rights Now! Board member Beverly Sharpe and her daughter Allison.

PART ONE

In 1994 Bev Sharpe gave birth a girl. Allison was a welcome addition to Bev’s family. At the age of eighteen months Bev was overjoyed to hear her daughter say the word “mama” for the first time but that joy soon turned to concern when Allison did not say it again. Bev, her husband, and son kept trying to prod Allison to say it again but she did not. Bev thought to herself “well this is different but she is a quiet, happy, little soul” and so Bev thought that Allison was doing things at her own pace. At the age of two Bev noticed that Allison wasn’t saying any words and she was “a little troubled by this because her brother was quite the little chatterbox”. Bev was told, by well intentioned friends and neighbours, that Einstein did not talk until he was five but Bev was concerned and so she called the North Shore Health Unit. A woman came to the house and explained that she was a Play Therapist and she suggested that Allison and her family engage in play therapy. The therapist also suggested that Bev book a pediatric appointment so that a diagnosis can be given, if there was one to give.

In late 1996, when Allison was two years and four months old Bev saw her family doctor who put her on a wait list for a pediatrician. There was a seven month wait for the appointment and during those months Bev took Allison to a special pediatric facility to test Allison’s hearing to see if she may be deaf. Allison and her hearing passed with flying colours and Bev continued to wonder what was going on.

During this time Bev also began to notice unusual behaviour, “Allison did spend an inordinate amount of time looking at the lines on her hands or staring out a window, squinting at the sun.” One day Bev stood in the doorframe of her kitchen and observed Allison who had pulled a chair up to the counter and was running her fingers through the beans soaking for dinner. “I remember standing at the door observing this child and thinking this is just so different.” Bev thought to herself that “whatever the problem is, if there is one, if you’re different I don’t mind because you’re a nice little girl and we don’t all have to fit into the mold”.

Allison continued to use the Play Therapist while awaiting the appointment with the pediatrician. She also had a Speech Language Pathologist through the North Shore Health Services work with Allison. The pathologist would spend half an hour each week with Allison but there no progress was made.

The appointment eventually rolled around and Bev took Allison hoping for answers. It was at this appointment when the pediatrician said the word “Autism”. As Bev relays her experience she begins to choke up with emotion at the thought of that shocking word. The appointment may have been fourteen years ago but the emotions of that day are still close to the surface as Bev relives hearing the word ‘Autism’ attached to her Allison.

The word Autism was not one that Bev had heard often and the “first vision that popped into my head was someone in an institution banging their head into a wall. I had no knowledge of Autism.”

The appointment with the pediatrician was mid-day and after hearing the doctor’s opinion Bev had to go back to work. “I took this word in and was stunned. I had that terrible dry mouth, that terrible sense that something is very wrong.” The first thing Bev did upon arriving at work was to look the word Autism up in the phone book. The Autism Society was listed in the phone book and so Bev called. They advised her to come to their office after work and so once the day was done she headed straight there. “I had three very nice ladies pass me tissues and give me videotapes on how to grieve. No one spoke about treatment”.

The next day, a Saturday, Bev was still in shock about the diagnosis and what to do. A neighbour asked Bev if is she was okay and Bev explained that the doctor had placed this label of Autism on Allison and the neighbour said “you must talk to Jean Lewis my neighbour because she has a child with Autism and she is doing a treatment program”. Bev was shocked to hear “the word treatment and I, I, I, was delighted, I was like oh there is treatment?” Bev stutters as she remembers this conversation still able to remember her shock and joy at hearing the word “treatment”. “I heard this from a neighbour but I didn’t hear this from the health unit, the Speech Pathologist, the Play Therapist, or the Autism Society at that time.”

The day after the diagnosis Bev phoned the Speech Pathologist and the Play Therapist to explain that she had the appointment with the doctor and that he used the word Autism. “What I wanted from those ladies was ‘oh we’ve worked with Allison all this time, don’t worry we don’t agree’, and they said ‘well we kind of knew as soon as we saw her’ and I said ‘what are you talking about, you knew this six months ago?’” Bev was angered that these women wasted six months of her time and her child’s time. “They actually did collateral damage” Bev explains, as the earlier the diagnosis the better chance the child has with treatment. She questioned them about it later and they explained that they were not qualified to give that opinion. Bev was outraged that people knew what her child had all along but did not feel that the information had to be shared.

Bev also spoke with a social worker that had been assigned to their family when they were given the diagnosis of Autism. Bev asks for a break in the interview to take a moment to collect herself as she relives the conversation with the social worker about Allison’s future. “I was told that children like Allison aren’t often able to remain in the home for more than a couple of years”. Bev understood, without the words literally being spoken, that the women was saying that Allison would most likely end up in an institution. The social worker then suggested to Bev that Bev “focus on my son’s needs”. As Bev explains the social worker was “basically telling me that Allison was a write off and not to spend too much time worrying about it.” Bev holds back the tears and anger as the recalls being told that there were “were special places for kids like Allison.”

PART TWO

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments